Increasing
access to quality primary medical care, especially for individuals with public
insurance coverage, is a key component of improving health outcomes for many
Americans. Peterson et al (2011)
compared the frequency of hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) use,
lengths of stay, mortality rates and total health care costs for certain
disease states (e.g. diabetes, asthma, vaccine preventable diseases,
appendicitis and psychiatric conditions) for publicly insured or uninsured individuals
and those with commercial insurance.
Individuals
with public insurance (primarily Medicaid) or no insurance have poorer health
outcomes and significantly higher hospitalization and emergency department
utilization rates than those with private insurance (Peterson et al,2011). They are also far more likely to
be hospitalized for high-severity illnesses and for conditions that may have
been preventable with access to primary medical care (Peterson et al, 2011),
resulting not only in poorer health outcomes, but also significantly higher
costs. Analysis done by Priority Health
in 2007 showed the ED visit rate for Priority Health commercial members was
approximately 200 visits/1,000; Priority Health’s Medicaid’s ED visit rate was
560 visits/1000 for Medicaid members under the age of 18.
According
to AHRQ, PCMHs have five functions and attributes. They must be patient-centered, provide
comprehensive care, coordinate care, increase access to care and have a
systems-based approach to quality and safety (www. pmch.ahrq.gov). In general, PCMHs focus on establishing
partnerships between patients and providers, so comprehensive preventive and
primary medical is provided in a culturally competent and efficient
manner.
While
PCMHs are not a cure-all for everything that ails the healthcare system, they
have a part to play in increasing access and quality, reducing costs and
improving outcomes.
ReplyDeleteHi Kristina, I really enjoyed your post. When I was researching for my prevention matrix I came across this Baggett (2011) article (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=baggett+2011+food) about how homeless people have high rates of hospitalization and emergency department use. The author calls for increased attention to the social factors that contribute to this issue and the hospital utilization patterns of homeless individuals. In your blog you mentioned how individuals with public insurance and no insurance have higher rates of hospitalization and poorer health outcomes. I think the use of PCMH is a really interesting topic. Have you found any evidence on the effectiveness of using PCMH? I think that combining these five functions (comprehensive care, patient-centered, coordinated care, accessible services and quality and safety) will hopefully improve health outcomes for those with no insurance. Has anyone looked at the social factors that may be associated with these poor outcomes in low income individuals?